|
It’s good news that the province is
about to proclaim a newer, tougher Dog
Act. There’s been a growing concern
about dangerous dogs, and after going
to the trouble of revising the act and
getting it passed only recently in the
legislature, it’s fitting that government
put it into effect.
Last week’s horrific incident whereby
three Rottweilers attacked and killed
young cattle in Little Pond may not
have been prevented by the new act,
but it would have given the authorities
much clearer direction on how to respond
to it.
Many Islanders were shocked when
they heard that the three dogs had
entered a pen and attacked the cattle.
Two were mutilated and fatally injured,
despite efforts of the owners to beat
off the dogs with shovels.
Immediately following the incident,
there was confusion about the fate
of the dogs because neither the police
nor the Humane Society had the authority
to put the dogs down. Little Pond
has no bylaws relating to dog control,
and apparently under the current Dog
Act, the Humane Society can’t euthanize
dangerous dogs without the owner’s
permission. Two of the dogs were put
down because the owners gave this
permission.
That this whole incident happened
is unfortunate enough. But that the
current legislation is so vague and
ineffective that even the officials
seemed powerless to act is simply
unacceptable.
Dangerous dogs have become a growing
concern across Canada as a result
of Rottweiler and pitbull attacks
on people and animals. Ontario’s ban
on certain breeds, such as Rottweilers
and pitbulls, goes into effect in
late August. While few disagree on
the need to control dangerous dogs,
there’s plenty of disagreement on
how to do it. Many support a ban on
certain breeds — 76 per cent of respondents
to a Guardian web poll endorse such
a prohibition — but there have been
no reported incidents in P.E.I. of
dog bites by either of the above breeds.
According to the Department of Agriculture,
50 per cent of all bites reported
over a two-year period were from collies.
The dog that bit a young New Haven
girl last month was a husky.
It may be premature to endorse a
ban on dog breeds. But it’s long past
time to bring in a tougher act that
stipulates the responsibilities of
owners and empowers the authorities
to take appropriate action if a dog
threatens, injures or kills. The act
that has recently been passed is far
superior to what we have now. It applies
provincewide and includes communities
without dog bylaws, and it imposes
fairly hefty fines. It also empowers
a judge to take whatever action deemed
necessary, including destroying a
dog and prohibiting an owner from
owning another dog.
The sooner the new law can be proclaimed,
the better off we’ll all be.
|